Comparing LEAN, StockSharp, and Backtrader from a Developer's Perspective: Architecture, Performance, MOEX
“Which framework to choose for algorithmic trading?”
Over the past 6 months, I tested three platforms: LEAN (QuantConnect) — C#/Python, StockSharp — C#, and Backtrader — Python.
I wrote identical strategies on all three. Measured backtest speed. Counted the time for MOEX integration.
Three Platforms, Three Philosophies
LEAN: Professional engine for quant funds. C# core, Python API, event-driven architecture, 400TB of historical data in the cloud.
StockSharp: Universal platform focused on performance and the Russian market. C#, visual Designer + API, 90+ connectors, microsecond order processing.
Backtrader: Simple and flexible Python framework. Pythonic API, large community, but development stopped in 2021.
Test 1: Simple Strategy (SMA Cross)
Same strategy on all three. Backtrader: 5 minutes to write, low complexity. LEAN: 10 minutes, medium complexity. StockSharp: 15 minutes, high complexity.
Winner for simplicity: Backtrader.
Test 2: Backtest Performance
Testing on 3 years of hourly data (~18,000 candles):
| Framework | Backtest Time | RAM Usage | Speed (candles/sec) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backtrader | 12 seconds | 150 MB | 1,500 |
| LEAN | 4 seconds | 220 MB | 4,500 |
| StockSharp | 3 seconds | 180 MB | 6,000 |
StockSharp and LEAN are 3-4x faster than Backtrader. StockSharp is fully C# with microsecond order processing.
Test 3: MOEX Integration
LEAN: No official MOEX support. Need to write a custom data feed (2-3 days, high complexity).
StockSharp: Native support for 90+ exchanges, including all Russian brokers. Setup: 30 minutes, low complexity, free.
Backtrader: Via third-party libraries (backtrader_moexalgo or aiomoex). Setup: 30 min-1 hour.
Winner: StockSharp (native support for all Russian brokers).
Test 4: Architecture Complexity
LEAN: Event-driven — realistic but complex debugging.
StockSharp: Message-based — flexible, HFT-ready, but steep learning curve.
Backtrader: Simple loop — easy to understand, transparent, but slow.
| Framework | Architecture Complexity | Learning Curve | Suitable for Beginners? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Backtrader | Low | 1-2 weeks | Yes |
| LEAN | Medium | 1 month | No |
| StockSharp | High | 2-3 months | No |
Real Case: HFT Strategy
For market making on futures where latency is critical (<5ms): StockSharp wins with 1-3ms latency. LEAN is borderline at 5-10ms. Backtrader doesn’t support real-time tick-by-tick.
Real Case: ML Strategy
For LSTM prediction with TensorFlow integration: Backtrader wins — Python-native, TensorFlow integrates naturally. LEAN and StockSharp require complex bridging to Python ML libraries.
Summary Table
| Criterion | Backtrader | LEAN | StockSharp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginner-friendly | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Backtest performance | 2/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| MOEX integration | 4/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 |
| HFT (latency <5ms) | No | 3/5 | 5/5 |
| ML integration | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Active development | No (2021) | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Russian community | 4/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 |
My Recommendation
Backtrader — if you’re a beginner, know Python, need ML, don’t need HFT.
LEAN — if you’re a quant developer, need international markets, ready to pay for QuantConnect cloud.
StockSharp — if you trade on MOEX, need HFT, know C#, want visual Designer + code.
If you’re a beginner — start with Backtrader. After 3-6 months, when you need speed or HFT — switch to StockSharp (especially for MOEX and crypto) or LEAN (for international stock markets).
Useful links:
Discussion
Join the discussion in our Telegram chat!